Risk of gout flare after medication: prescription symmetry sequence analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The research aimed to study the following questions: (1) five well-known gout-related medications were selected to test the validity of the prescription symmetry sequence analysis in Taiwan; (2) four exploratory medications were selected to test their relation to gout flares. METHODS: We utilized the 2003-2017 dataset of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program containing all claims data with 2 million beneficiaries as a data source. In order to explore the temporal association, we designed a scenario of medication-induced gout flares. Nine medications were selected as the index agent, including aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, metformin, pioglitazone, fenofibrate, and losartan. The gout flare was defined as subjects with use of the marker agent for treatment of gout flares. The observation-window period between initiation of the index agent and initiation of the marker agent was 1 year. Subjects who used an index agent and a marker agent on the same day were excluded. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis was carried out to compare the observed number of persons who took an index agent prior to starting a marker agent with the observed number of persons who took a marker agent before starting an index agent. The adjusted sequence ratio (adjusted SR) with 95% confidence interval was applied to estimate the relation between an index agent and the marker agent. RESULTS: Among five medications including aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, the adjusted sequence ratio ranged from 1.15 to 3.35 and all reached statistical significance. Fenofibrate use and losartan use were associated with a lower probability of gout flares, with reaching statistical significance (adjusted SR = 0.60 for fenofibrate and adjusted SR = 0.92 for losartan). Metformin use was associated with a greater probability of gout flares, with reaching statistical significance (adjusted SR = 1.14). Pioglitazone use did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Based on the confirmatory analysis including five well-known gout-related medications, this study supports that the prescription symmetry sequence analysis can be used to detect an adverse drug event associated with one potential offending agent. The exposure to fenofibrate or losartan might be a protective factor against gout flares. Metformin use could be associated with a greater probability of gout flares, but this finding should be validated by other studies. KEY POINTS: • What is already known about this subject? 1. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis is a useful method for detecting an adverse drug reaction associated with one potential offending drug. 2. Numerous medications are found to induce gout flares. • What does this study add? 1. The prescription symmetry sequence analysis supports the evidence that aspirin (low-dose), thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, ethambutol and pyrazinamide are associated with a greater probability of gout flares. 2. The exposure to fenofibrate or losartan might be a protective factor against gout flares. 3. Metformin use could be associated with a greater probability of gout flares. • How might this impact on clinical practice or future developments? 1. Clinicians should always consider the possibility of medication-induced gout flares. If gout flares develop, discontinuation of risky medications is the first step. Then prescribing cascades can be eliminated.

A randomised clinical trial study assessing the efficacy of 5% losartan potassium loaded in ethosomal gel to treat human keloids: a trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Keloid is a skin disorder that results from excessive fibrous tissue growth in the area of the initial trauma. Treating keloids can be challenging since the success of various treatments varies from one study to another. Triamcinolone acetonide injection, a standard treatment, can cause undesirable side effects. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of existing topical therapies for keloids is not always reliable. The pro-inflammatory, pro-proliferative, and pro-fibrotic effects of angiotensin II in human skin contribute to keloid formation. Losartan potassium, an angiotensin II blocker, has the potential to act as an anti-keloid agent. Due to the thicker skin structure of a keloid and ease of application, ethosome gel is chosen as a safe and comfortable carrier for losartan potassium, making it a good choice for treating keloids. METHODS: In this randomised clinical trial, 46 adults with keloids were divided into two treatment groups. One group of 23 participants received 5% losartan potassium loaded in ethosomal gel, while the other group of 23 participants received intralesional injections of 10% triamcinolone acetonide. Over 12 weeks, changes in POSAS 3.0 scores, degree of erythema and pigmentation, surface area, thickness, and pliability of the keloids will be measured at four different times: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Statistical analysis will be conducted using SPSS software version 24, with a significance level of p < 0.05. DISCUSSION: Losartan potassium is believed to be beneficial for keloid management because it inhibits the angiotensin II receptor, which plays a role in inflammation, proliferation, and fibrosis. This study examines the efficacy of 5% losartan potassium loaded in ethosomal gel for human keloids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT05893108 . Registered on 7 June 2023.

A Rare Case of Losartan-Induced Visceral Angioedema.

The following describes a case of isolated visceral angioedema related to an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) medication. Additionally, we discuss the pathophysiology of drug-induced angioedema, various presentations that can be encountered, and the leading theorized mechanisms of how renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocking medications lead to angioedema. The goal of sharing this case is to help increase awareness of the possibility of ARB-induced angioedema and to recommend keeping visceral angioedema as part of the differential diagnosis when presented with a patient who is taking an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or ARB medication that is experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms of unclear etiology.

Risk of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan in patients.

There is a lack of studies comparing the risk of cardio-cerebrovascular disease between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) of different half-lives. We aimed to compare the risks of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and cerebrovascular disease with the use of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan with different half-lives in a national claim-based retrospective cohort of patients aged ≥ 40 years with hypertension. To establish a cohort exposed to valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, or telmisartan, we performed propensity score (PS) matching and used an as-treated approach to evaluate exposure. The Cox regression model was employed to calculate hazard ratios, which were based on the incidence rate for each newly occurring event of MI, heart failure, or cerebrovascular disease. These hazard ratios were calculated to compare the risk of MI, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease associated with valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan in comparison to telmisartan. A PS-matched cohort of 148,229 patients was established for each of valsartan, losartan, irbesartan, or telmisartan. The matched cohort analysis showed that the adjusted hazard ratio (aHRs, 95% confidence interval) for MI was higher for valsartan use (1.39, 1.33-1.45) and losartan use (1.10, 1.05-1.15) but lower for irbesartan use (0.90, 0.86-0.94) compared with the reference (telmisartan). The aHRs for HF were not different among these ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The aHR for cerebrovascular disease was lower for valsartan use (0.85, 0.83-0.87) and losartan use (0.80, 0.78-0.82) but higher for irbesartan use (1.11, 1.09-1.13) compared with the reference. We found differences in the risk of MI and cerebrovascular disease with the use of different ARBs compared to telmisartan use. Valsartan, and losartan with a short half-life, which showed a higher risk of MI, had a lower risk of cerebrovascular disease. Conversely, irbesartan with a long half-life, which showed a lower risk of MI, had a higher risk of cerebrovascular disease.

Losartan-Induced Angioedema with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (Anaphylaxis): A Case Report.

Angioedema is a condition characterized by swelling of the skin or mucosa resulting from loss of vascular integrity that leads to swelling of mucosal tissues and can lead to life-threatening respiratory compromise. Drug-induced angioedema is not a frequent side effect seen with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), particularly when there are no other contributing risk factors like a prior episode. Few studies reported subsequent angioedema episodes after ARB use in patients who had a prior episode with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; however, there are very few cases that documented non-fatal angioedema after ARB as the only therapy. We report a rare case of life-threatening anaphylaxis after losartan use. We hope that our case will bring awareness to this rare but fatal side effect in order to quickly recognize it and encourage further research.

Hyperuricemia and Gout: The Role of Losartan.

Losartan is the only angiotensin II receptor blocker that has shown to significantly lower uric acid levels. The addition of or switch to losartan as an antihypertensive agent for patients with gout is recommended by clinical guidelines because of its benefit as a uricosuric agent.

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Combination of Amlodipine, Losartan, Rosuvastatin, and Ezetimibe in Patients with Concomitant Essential Hypertension and Dyslipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination (SPC) consisting of four medications in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose SPC consisting of 5 mg amlodipine, 100 mg losartan, 20 mg rosuvastatin, and 10 mg ezetimibe (A/L/R/E) in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia. METHODS: This was a 14-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial. In total, 145 patients were randomized to receive A/L/R/E, A/L, or L/R/E. The primary endpoints were the average change in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in the A/L/R/E and A/L groups and the sitting systolic blood pressure (sitSBP) in the A/L/R/E and L/R/E groups. The numbers of patients with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were compared as safety variables. RESULTS: The average percentage change in the LDL-C level as the least squares mean (LSM) from the baseline LDL-C level at the end of the 8-week treatment was - 59.0% in the A/L/R/E group and 0.2% in the A/L group (LSM difference - 59.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 68.1 to - 50.4; p < 0.0001). The average change in the sitSBP as the LSM was - 15.8 mmHg in the A/L/R/E group and -4.7 mmHg in the L/R/E group (LSM difference - 11.1, 95% CI - 16.8 to - 5.4; p = 0.0002). No ADRs occurred in the A/L/R/E group. CONCLUSIONS: A/L/R/E as an SPC could be an effective treatment for patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia without significant safety issues. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04074551 (registered 30 August 2019).

Losartan in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been hypothesized to benefit patients with COVID-19 via the inhibition of viral entry and other mechanisms. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis assessing the effect of starting the ARB losartan in recently hospitalized COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2021 for U.S./Canada-based trials where an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/ARB was a treatment arm, targeted outcomes could be extrapolated, and data sharing was allowed. Our primary outcome was a 7-point COVID-19 ordinal score measured 13 to 16 days post-enrollment. We analyzed data by fitting multilevel Bayesian ordinal regression models and standardizing the resulting predictions. RESULTS: 325 participants (156 losartan vs 169 control) from 4 studies contributed IPD. Three were randomized trials; one used non-randomized concurrent and historical controls. Baseline covariates were reasonably balanced for the randomized trials. All studies evaluated losartan. We found equivocal evidence of a difference in ordinal scores 13-16 days post-enrollment (model-standardized odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.76-1.71; adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CrI 0.15-3.59) and no compelling evidence of treatment effect heterogeneity among prespecified subgroups. Losartan had worse effects for those taking corticosteroids at baseline after adjusting for covariates (ratio of adjusted ORs 0.29, 95% CrI 0.08-0.99). Hypotension serious adverse event rates were numerically higher with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: In this IPD meta-analysis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we found no convincing evidence for the benefit of losartan versus control treatment, but a higher rate of hypotension adverse events with losartan.

Efficacy and Safety of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Pediatric Patients (Aged 6 to 18) with Hypertension: A Systematic Review.

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed in pediatric hypertension because of the fundamental role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of hypertension. We, therefore, aimed to systematically review articles that investigated efficacy and safety of ARB agents in the pediatric population aged over six years. To do so, the databases of Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched to conduct a systematic review by using the following keywords: ("angiotensin receptor blocker" OR "valsartan" OR "losartan") AND ("pediatric" OR "children" OR "child") AND ("high blood pressure" OR "hypertension"). Finally, 12 studies were included in our review, and we found that almost all of them supported the effectiveness and tolerability of different ARB agents. Candesartan cilexetil lowered blood pressure (BP), with a 9 mmHg decline in both systolic and diastolic BP, and proteinuria after four months of treatment. Valsartan and Losartan similarly were shown to be effective in lowering BP in a dose-dependent manner. Headache, dizziness, upper respiratory infection, and cough were the most reported side effects. However, almost all reviewed studies indicated that the safety profile was satisfactory. In conclusion, ARBs are beneficial and well-tolerated antihypertensive medications.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7228.

Aerobic Physical Exercise is Essential for Cardiac Autonomic Regulation in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Chronic Treatment with Renin- Angiotensin System Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) presents contradictions about the recovery of damage in cardiovascular autonomic modulation characterized by reduced heart rate variability (HRV) and increased blood pressure variability (BPV). Conversely, the association of RASi with physical training can influence achievements in cardiovascular autonomic modulation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of aerobic physical training on hemodynamics and cardiovascular autonomic modulation in hypertensive volunteers untreated and treated with RASi. METHODS: A non-randomized controlled trial in which 54 men (≅ 40-60 years old) with a history of hypertension for >2 years were allocated in accordance with their characteristics into three groups: untreated (Control; n=16), treated with type 1 angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blocker (losartan; n=21), and treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril; n=17). All participants underwent hemodynamic, metabolic, and cardiovascular autonomic evaluation using baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and spectral analysis of HRV and BPV, before and after 16 weeks of supervised aerobic physical training. RESULTS: The volunteers treated with RASi had lower BPV and HRV, both in the supine position and in the tilt test, with the losartan group having the lowest values. Aerobic physical training increased HRV and BRS in all groups. However, the association of enalapril with physical training appears to be more prominent. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with enalapril and losartan may harm the autonomic modulation of HRV and BRS. Aerobic physical training is essential to promote positive adjustments in the autonomic modulation of HRV and BRS in hypertensive patients treated with RASi, especially with enalapril.

High- versus low-dose losartan and uric acid: An analysis from HEAAL.

BACKGROUND: Serum uric acid (SUA) is activated in catabolic, hypoxic, and inflammatory conditions characteristic of heart failure (HF) and is a source of reactive oxygen species. Losartan is unique among other angiotensin receptor blockers in reducing SUA. OBJECTIVES: To study the patient characteristics and outcome associations by SUA levels, as well as the effect of high- vs. low-dose losartan on SUA levels in HF. METHODS: HEAAL was a double-blind trial, comparing the effect of two doses of losartan 150 (high dose) vs. 50 (low dose) mg/day among 3834 patients with symptomatic HF, a left ventricular ejection fraction≤40 %, and known intolerance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In the present study, we studied the associations of SUA with outcomes and the effect of high- vs. low-dose losartan on SUA levels, incident hyperuricemia, and gout. RESULTS: Patients with higher SUA had more comorbidities, worse renal function, were more symptomatic, used diuretics more frequently, and were 1.5- to 2-fold more likely to experience HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death. The benefit of high-dose losartan to improve HF outcomes was not influenced by baseline SUA levels (interaction p > 0.1). Compared with low-dose, high-dose losartan reduced SUA by -0.27 (-0.34 to -0.21) mg/dL, p < 0.001. The incidence of hyperuricemia was reduced with high-dose losartan, but the incidence of gout was not. CONCLUSIONS: In HEAAL, hyperuricemia was associated with worse outcomes. High-dose losartan reduced SUA and hyperuricemia more than low-dose and the cardiovascular benefits of high-dose losartan were not modified by SUA levels.

Delayed-Onset Losartan-Induced Pancreatitis Secondary to an Overdose: A Case Report.

Acute pancreatitis is defined as inflammation of the pancreas and is most commonly caused by gallstones and alcohol use. Less commonly, acute pancreatitis can be drug induced from medications that are divided into 5 subgroups (classes Ia-V). The subgroups are determined based on the cases reported, reaction with rechallenge and a consistent period of latency. We describe a case of a 34-year-old female who overdosed on losartan pills in a suicide attempt but developed symptoms of drug-induced acute pancreatitis nearly a week later without gallstones, alcohol involvement, or other drug toxicity.

Co-administration of metformin and/or glibenclamide with losartan reverse NG-nitro-l-arginine-methyl ester-streptozotocin-induced hypertensive diabetes and haemodynamic sequelae in rats.

Over the years, there have been opinions on whether to reduced blood pressure (BP) to a different levels in patients with diabetes mellitus. Hence, this study investigated the efficacy of the co-administration of losartan (angiotensin receptor blocking antihypertensive agent) with metformin and/or glibenclamide (antidiabetic agents) on hypertensive-diabetic experimental rats induced by NG-nitro-l-arginine-methyl-ester hydrochloride (l-NAME), and streptozotocin (STZ). STZ (45 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced diabetic rats combined with l-NAME (40 mg/kg, p.o.)-induced hypertension were allotted into different groups. Group 1 received distilled water (10 mL/kg) and served as normal control, group 2 comprised hypertensive diabetic rats with distilled water, groups 3-5 were hypertensive-diabetic rats but received combination treatments of losartan + metformin, losartan + glibenclamide, and losartan + metformin + glibenclamide daily for 8 weeks, respectively. Our finding revealed no changes in the body weights, but there was a significant increase in fasting blood sugar levels in l-NAME - STZ-induced hypertensive-diabetes, which were lowered by losartan + metformin, losartan + glibenclamide, and losartan + metformin + glibenclamide treatments. Moreover, the increased systolic-BP, mean arterial pressure but not diastolic-BP and heart rate by l-NAME + STZ were attenuated more significantly by losartan + metformin + glibenclamide between weeks 2-8 relative to hypertensive-diabetic control. l-NAME + STZ-induced elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase and creatinine kinase, were differentially reversed by losartan + metformin, losartan + glibenclamide, and losartan + metformin + glibenclamide. However, l-NAME + STZ-induced decreased nitrite level was significantly restored by all treatments, suggesting increased nitrergic transmission. Additionally, l-NAME + STZ-induced degeneration of pancreatic islet and myocardial cells were dramatically alleviated by losartan + metformin + glibenclamide treatments. Our findings suggest hyperglycemia with raised systolic-BP should be managed with losartan combined with both metformin and glibenclamide than single combination of losartan with antidiabetics.

MULTIPLE KERATINOCYTIC CANCERS AFTER ENALAPRIL/LOSARTAN INTAKE: POTENTIAL LINKS TO DRUG MEDIATED NITROSOGENESIS/CARCINOGENESIS: MELOLABIAL ADVANCED FLAP AND UNDERMINING SURGERY AS OPTIMAL THERAPEUTIC APPROACH.

According to scientific databases, nitrosogenesis and carcinogenesis have been inextricably linked for decades and are undoubtedly one of the most serious causes of cancer induction (not only skin cancer) known to humankind.Some of the most potent modifiers of human DNA turn out to be numerous, known since the last century, difficult to classify as carcinogenic potency, yet available for decades as additional, unregulated, often undisclosed ingredients in about (currently) 300 drugs used by at least 5 billion patients worldwide. While this may sound ridiculous, this information turns out to be reality. A reality accompanied by a drastic jump in the incidence of skin cancers (keratinocytic and melanoma), but also of predicted general cancers, in relation to the year 2040 and disclosed by Globocan.Starting from the thesis of nitrosogenesis and possible contamination with mutagens, we present a case of a 95-year-old female who developed 13 keratinocytic tumors within the potentially/actually contaminated intake of drugs from the group of ACE inhibitors/Enalapril and Sartans/Losartan. A correlation was made between the carcinogenic potency of the possible contaminants (according to the 2023 FDA classification) and the number of cancers occurring within that intake follow-up.The patient was successfully treated surgically with a melolabial flap for the high-risk tumor under the right eyelid and multiple elliptical excisions for the remaining tumors, followed by extension flaps to cover the defects. The role of nitrosogenesis and its relationship to keratinocytic cancers is discussed and analyzed.

Incidence and Pattern of Aminotransferase Elevation During Anti-Hypertensive Therapy With Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin type II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most widely used anti-hypertensive drugs. This study aimed to elucidate the likelihood and pattern of ARB-induced liver injury in a hospital-based cohort. METHODS: Data of patients receiving fimasartan (n = 5,543), candesartan (n = 6,406), valsartan (n = 6,040), and losartan (n = 9,126) were retrieved from the clinical data warehouse of two tertiary hospitals. Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 5 times the upper normal limit were assessed according to the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). RESULTS: A total of 27,115 patients were enrolled, including 14,630 (54.0%) men, with a mean age of 64.6 years (standard deviation, 13.6). During 31,717 person-years of ARB therapy, serum ALT levels > 120 IU/L were found in 558 (2.1%) person-years, and levels > 200 IU/L were found in 155 (0.6%) person-years. The incidence of ALT elevation > 120 IU/L per 106 cumulative defined daily doses was 6.6, 3.6, 3.9, and 4.0 in the fimasartan, candesartan, valsartan, and losartan groups, respectively (P = 0.002). An ALT level > 200 IU/L with RUCAM score ≥ 6 was found in 20 patients, suggesting probable drug-induced liver injury for 11 (0.2%) patients receiving fimasartan, five (0.1%) receiving candesartan, four (0.1%) receiving valsartan, and none receiving losartan (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Approximately 2% of patients receiving ARB therapy had significant ALT elevation (4.24/106 cumulative defined daily doses [cDDDs]), which was associated with probable ARB-related liver injury in 0.07% of patients (0.15/106 cDDDs). Elevation of ALT was more commonly associated with fimasartan than the other ARBs. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of ARB-related ALT elevation in patients with unexplained chronic abnormal ALT.

Short-term Effects of Losartan on Cardiovascular Risk and Allograft Injury Biomarkers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is a controversy over the renoprotective and cardioprotective effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term effects of losartan on allograft injury, cardiovascular risk biomarkers and safety of the treatment in KTRs. METHODS: An interim analysis of a prospective, open, multicenter, controlled clinical trial CELART (Cardiovascular Effects of Losartan After Renal Transplantation) was performed. KTRs were allocated to losartan (L) 50 to 100 mg or standard hypotensive treatment (ST) group to reach target blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mm Hg. The short-term effects of the therapy were evaluated after 6 months: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria, the intrarenal fibrosis biomarkers: urine excretion of transforming growth factor ß-1 (TGFß-1) and procollagen type III amino terminal propeptide (PIIINP), cardiac biomarker: serum concentration of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement, and hemoglobin and potassium concentrations. RESULTS: At baseline the groups did not differ with respect to age, primary nephropathy, comorbidity, immunosuppressive therapy, albuminuria, and graft function. A total of 61 (L group) and 73 (ST group) patients reached the target BP and completed protocol at 6 months. After 6 months of therapy there were no significant differences in changes of eGFR, albuminuria, hemoglobin and potassium concentrations, urine excretion of PIIINP, and TGFß-1 between groups. There was a trend in the L group to decrease the concentration of serum NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan shows minimal adverse effects and no influence on graft function and biomarkers of graft fibrosis. It may have a positive effect on cardiovascular risk in KTRs. Further interim analyses of the CELART study will be conducted.

Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine Compared With Losartan for Mild Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most challenging public health problems worldwide. Previous studies suggested that the Songling Xuemaikang capsule (SXC)-a Chinese herbal formula-was effective for essential hypertension. However, the efficacy of SXC monotherapy for hypertension remains unclear. We aimed to compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of SXC versus losartan in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in China, patients 18 to 65 years of age with mild essential hypertension were randomly allocated to receive either SXC or losartan for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in sitting diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks, with a predefined noninferiority margin of -2.5 mm Hg. RESULTS: Of the 755 patients who entered a 2-week run-in period, 628 patients (327 women and 301 men; mean [SD] age, 52.6 [9.2] years) were randomly assigned to the SXC (n=314) or losartan (n=314) group. The primary analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle showed that the change in diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks was similar between the SXC and losartan groups (-7.9 [8.0] versus -8.1 [7.9]). The lower boundary of 95% CI (mean difference, -0.24 [95% CI, -1.51 to 1.03]) was above the margin of -2.5 mm Hg, showing noninferiority. Results were consistent with per-protocol analysis. SXC produced greater improvements in total hypertension symptom score (-5.7 [4.2] versus -5.0 [4.0]; P=0.020) and total cholesterol (-0.1 [1.0] versus 0.1 [1.2]; P=0.025). There were no differences between groups in the other BP and patient-reported outcomes. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SXC was well tolerated and demonstrated noninferior to losartan in BP lowering in patients with mild hypertension. SXC might be an alternative for mild hypertension, particularly for patients with a preference for natural medicine. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-16008108.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of losartan for pediatric NAFLD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To date, no pharmacotherapy exists for pediatric NAFLD. Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has been proposed as a treatment due to its antifibrotic effects. APPROACH AND RESULTS: The Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network conducted a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in children with histologically confirmed NAFLD at 10 sites (September 2018 to April 2020). Inclusion criteria were age 8-17 years, histologic NAFLD activity score ≥ 3, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 50 U/l. Children received 100 mg of losartan or placebo orally once daily for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in ALT levels from baseline to 24 weeks, and the preset sample size was n = 110. Treatment effects were assessed using linear regression of change in treatment group adjusted for baseline value. Eighty-three participants (81% male, 80% Hispanic) were randomized to losartan (n = 43) or placebo (n = 40). During an enrollment pause, necessitated by the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, an unplanned interim analysis showed low probability (7%) of significant group difference. The Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended early study termination. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The 24-week change in ALT did not differ significantly between losartan versus placebo groups (adjusted mean difference: 1.1 U/l; 95% CI = -30.6, 32.7; p = 0.95), although alkaline phosphatase decreased significantly in the losartan group (adjusted mean difference: -23.4 U/l; 95% CI = -41.5, -5.3; p = 0.01). Systolic blood pressure decreased in the losartan group but increased in placebo (adjusted mean difference: -7.5 mm Hg; 95% CI = -12.2, -2.8; p = 0.002). Compliance by pill counts and numbers and types of adverse events did not differ by group. CONCLUSIONS: Losartan did not significantly reduce ALT in children with NAFLD when compared with placebo.

Investigation of the Antiremodeling Effects of Losartan, Mirabegron and Their Combination on the Development of Doxorubicin-Induced Chronic Cardiotoxicity in a Rat Model.

Despite the effectiveness of doxorubicin (DOXO) as a chemotherapeutic agent, dose-dependent development of chronic cardiotoxicity limits its application. The angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan is commonly used to treat cardiac remodeling of various etiologies. The beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist mirabegron was reported to improve chronic heart failure. Here we investigated the effects of losartan, mirabegron and their combination on the development of DOXO-induced chronic cardiotoxicity. Male Wistar rats were divided into five groups: (i) control; (ii) DOXO-only; (iii) losartan-treated DOXO; (iv) mirabegron-treated DOXO; (v) losartan plus mirabegron-treated DOXO groups. The treatments started 5 weeks after DOXO administration. At week 8, echocardiography was performed. At week 9, left ventricles were prepared for histology, qRT-PCR, and Western blot measurements. Losartan improved diastolic but not systolic dysfunction and ameliorated SERCA2a repression in our DOXO-induced cardiotoxicity model. The DOXO-induced overexpression of Il1 and Il6 was markedly decreased by losartan and mirabegron. Mirabegron and the combination treatment improved systolic and diastolic dysfunction and significantly decreased overexpression of Smad2 and Smad3 in our DOXO-induced cardiotoxicity model. Only mirabegron reduced DOXO-induced cardiac fibrosis significantly. Mirabegron and its combination with losartan seem to be promising therapeutic tools against DOXO-induced chronic cardiotoxicity.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of amlodipine/losartan-based single-pill combination therapy in patients with hypertension: Findings from real-world, multicenter observational databases.

Various single-pill combinations (SPCs) have been introduced to improve drug compliance and clinical efficacy. However, there is a lack of real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of these SPCs for hypertension. This study evaluated the real-world clinical efficacy and safety of amlodipine/losartan-based SPC therapies in patients with hypertension in a real-world setting. A total of 15 538 patients treated with amlodipine/losartan-based SPCs [amlodipine + losartan (AL), amlodipine + losartan + rosuvastatin (ALR), and amlodipine + losartan + chlorthalidone (ALC)] were selected from the database of three tertiary hospitals in Korea. The efficacy endpoints were target blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) achievement rates. Safety was evaluated based on laboratory parameters. Drug adherence was defined as the proportion of medication days covered (PDC). The target BP attainment rate was above 90% and was similar among the three groups. Although many patients in the AL and ALC groups took statins, the target LDL-C attainment rate was significantly higher in the ALR group than in the AL and ALC groups. Safety endpoints were not significantly different among the groups, except serum uric acid level and incidence rate of new-onset hyperuricemia, which were significantly lower in the AL and ALR groups than in the ALC group. The PDC was > 90% in all groups. In the real-world hypertensive patients, amlodipine/losartan-based SPC therapy demonstrated good target BP achievement rates. Especially, rosuvastatin-combination SPC showed better target LDL-C goal achievement rate compared to the other SPCs. All three amlodipine/losartan-based SPC had excellent drug adherence.